Macbraughton Culture – Creativity – Conflict

23Jun/093

Toronto Emergency Services Down to 75% Staffing Levels

I'm just trying to get the word out everyone. If you look at the wording of official City of Toronto corporation when it comes to Emergency Services, here are a few quotes:

The official statement from Mayor David Miller (who, BTW, happens to have a twitter page @mayormiller.)

And although impacted by the work stoppage, emergency medical services will continue to operate...

And city councilor for my area, Mark Grimes, put on his twitter page @Mark_Grimes:

I regret the inconveniences caused by the strike. The City is trying to bring this to a quick resolution. Emergency Services are operating.

Because the city is so focused on the lack of garbage collection, the public is still not being told clearly that when you call 911 for an ambulance, there will be less dispatchers to answer the phones, and there will be less paramedics on the road to take patients to the hospital by ambulance. Emergency response times will be affected, how could they not be with only 75% of us working?

In an emergency, seconds can make the difference between life and death. The politicians are therefore playing with people's lives at this point, asking for unreasonable concessions that will probably end up with the Province of Ontario stepping in and passing legislation, as John Laforet discusses in his blogpost City Negotiators Need to Ask ‘What Would Arbitration Do?’

I received my phone call last night informing me that I am not supposed to come to my scheduled shift for this evening. Please understand, I am not exaggerating, I am an emergency medical dispatcher for the City of Toronto. I was scheduled to go into work tonight. I can personally attest that there will be one less person to answer the phone and dispatch ambulances if you call 911 for an ambulance tonight. I am officially on strike.

Ask yourself, should the City of Toronto be able to put public health at risk for their political maneuvering? This is just plain wrong. The people that are really hurt over this are the sick and elderly, the weak and dying, those who already have no one to stand up for them. Call or email or write the mayor's office and your local city councilor and tell them that you want 100% of the Emergency Medical Services to be operational!

You can find a copy of Mayor Miller's statement as well as links to many of the media resources on the Toronto strike at Torontopedia.ca. Please help raise awareness that 911 ambulance dispatchers and paramedics are on strike as well by passing this post on to others. Thank you for your support and comments.

21Jun/099

The City of Toronto – Where all they Care About is the Garbage

I'm a little irritated right now. Nothing unusual for me, certainly, but this time I know I'm not alone. There are a lot of people in this city irritated right now and a lot more who may be as this week gets going because City of Toronto workers are getting ready to go on strike tonight at midnight.

One of the main issues: sick time. The corporation that runs this town says that it shells out too much cash paying workers when they are sick and don't come to work. They want to save money by lowering the number of sick days that people are allotted for the year and not allow them to accumulate what is called a "sick bank" of days that add up over a persons career when they don't use them.

One of the things that I'm probably most annoyed with is that other unionized city employees have already made their deals without any concessions. I'm talking about the TTC, Toronto Police Service, and Toronto Fire Services to name the most visible. The City of Toronto employees that will be striking this week are Local 79 and Local 416 workers, which represent "inside workers" and "outside workers" respectively, that is, all of the rest of the city's employees who don't have their own special union.

While everybody on the radio and television is talking about the garbage piling up, and the Pride parade possibly being canceled, these red herrings only keep the public from noticing one very important point: Toronto Emergency Medical Services are part of Local 416 and Local 79.

What this means to you is that come tomorrow morning, if grandpa has a heart attack, there will be less ambulance dispatchers available to answer the phone when you call 911, and less ambulances on the road with paramedics to give grandpa life saving drugs and take him to the nearest hospital. Yes, you can rest assured that we will have public transportation, law and order, and property protection if there is a fire, but for some reason human life isn't at the top of the priority list for the City of Toronto corporation.

With the possibility of only 75% of the paramedics and dispatchers who work for Toronto EMS coming to work tomorrow, despite what disinformation the City of Toronto corporation feels like spreading, I can tell you that there will be delays in 911 calls being answered and dispatched, as well as paramedics arriving to the scene of calls and transporting patients to hospitals.

In the event of a labour disruption, emergency calls for ambulance/paramedic services will continue as usual. Non-emergency and low priority calls may be affected.
~City of Toronto - Labour Relations

Part of the problem is that Toronto Emergency Medical Services should either have its own union or bargaining unit, or it should at least be designated an essential service so that public health is not put in jeopardy just because the City of Toronto is trying to save a few bucks.

I can't speak for other Local 416 or Local 79 employees because I don't know what it is like for them.  I can only speak for myself, and my wife (who is a paramedic), and the people I know who every time they go to work they put themselves in the center of the some of the most difficult and traumatic experiences that our community faces each and every day. 

I know that paramedics come into contact with the sickest people in this city, and also have a very physical job that involves a lot of lifting (for instance, moving an unconscious person is probably a lot harder than you would think).  Emergency Medical Dispatchers (the group that I belong to) deal with the constant stress and anxiety of family members calling 911 for sick loved ones, as well as the distressed patients themselves whether they be trauma victims or suffering from acute or chronic medical conditions.

As a group, we deal with human frailty each and every day, 24 hours a day seven days a week, yet, by threatening to take away paid sick time, we are not even afforded the respect of being acknowledged as frail human beings ourselves.

Wake up, Toronto! The people who answer the phone when you call 911 and come and take care of you and your family and friends through difficult and traumatic times are just people, just like you. There is a cost for putting one's self out there to help people in distress, and again, I can only speak for Toronto EMS employees, unfortunately there are a lot of people in our line of work who deal with their own medical conditions, sickness, and injuries.

Citizens of Toronto, this is your city. It does not belong to the corporation who is elected and appointed to serve you, its citizens. Please pass along your voice of support for Toronto EMS to your local city councilor and to David Miller's office in support of the people who are always there when you need them, who need your help right now. Remind them who they work for - You! It is neither fair nor equitable for them to put public health at risk because of their political maneuvering. Show them that you care about more than whether your garbage gets picked up next week.

Just to be clear, those of us who work for Toronto EMS and are manning the phones and ambulances during this strike will do our best to serve you, the citizens of Toronto. Just be advised, there will be less of us there to carry the load. At only 75% of normal staffing, this will definitely affect our response times.

Also, on a personal level, I want to say that I live with my family in Toronto, so as fellow residents this affects us too. This goes beyond my employment, I don't appreciate the City of Toronto corporation thinking that it is okay to keep Emergency Medical Services staffed at less than 100% of normal operational levels. That is why I am posting this right now. At this time we still don't know if the strike will happen or not.

Thank you for your support and comments are welcome.

14Apr/091

File Number # 8740-B2-200904989 – Bell Canada – TN 7181

I just received this email from my ISP.  After reading it over I posted a response to the indicated URL.  I wanted to show the world just how manipulative and evil Bell Canada can be.  I should know, I worked for one of their mutant symbionts in the states (AT&T formerly known as SBC formerly known as Southwestern Bell before the breakup of Ma Bell when they and Verizon and Bell Canada  were all just parts of the biggest monopoly the world had ever seen).

**********

Dear Valued Customer,

We are writing to you today as many activities are underway to shape/reshape
Internet use as you all know it. Over the last year some of you have been
made aware and/or have seen activities on throttling in the news or in your
daily lives. Another proceeding relating to the Internet in Canada required
Telecom providers (Bell/Telus/etc.) to provide ISPs with wholesale service
speeds that match those that they offer to their own retail customers.
Specifically, Bell has been directed by the CRTC to provide matching speeds
which would allow us all to have more flexibility in our day to day online
requirements. Instead of adhering to these directives, Bell decided to take
this issue to the federal Cabinet and at the same time file a tariff
application with the CRTC proposing to introduce Usage Based Billing (UBB)
on its wholesale customer accounts.

What does this mean for you, the consumer?

Bell provides TekSavvy with last mile, wholesale DSL access services, which
TekSavvy uses to provide you with your Internet access. If Bell were to be
allowed to introduce UBB on this service, a cap of 60GB would be imposed on
all of its users, with very heavy penalties per Gigabyte afterwards
(multiple times more than our current per Gigabyte rate of $0.25/GB on
overages). This would inherently all but remove Unlimited internet services
in Ontario/Quebec and potentially cause large increases in internet costs
from month to month.

If you'd like to make your comments/concerns known about what Bell is
attempting to do, please do so here:

http://support.crtc.gc.ca/crtcsubmissionmu/forms/Telecom.aspx?lang=e

Select the word "Tariff" from the drop down list.

Add the following in Subject Line "File Number # 8740-B2-200904989 - Bell
Canada - TN 7181" and make your thoughts known!

The deadline for filing your comments is today at midnight, so hurry!

Regards,

*********

HERE IS MY RESPONSE:

Nothing less than the future of Canadian innovation is at stake with this tariff.  The only party this helps is Bell Canada, and their legacy of control and manipulation.  There is no way that this is good for the average consumer who will end up paying for it.  Rather than becoming more competitive and implementing technology that gives consumers more choice and more value for their money, Bell Canada is seeking governmental approval for its mismanagement and abuse of technological resources.

Ten years ago 60 gigabytes a month of downloads would have seemed an outrageously high number.  But then again, ten years ago a dial-up internet connection and 56 kilobytes per second was the norm. Even so, under ideal conditions it would have been possible to download over 145 gigabytes of data in a month! (56 kb/sec * 60 sec * 60 min * 24 hours * 30 days = 145152000 kb = 145.152 GB/month).  So even though 60 gigabytes seemed like a lot back then it still represented less than half of the potential amount of data that could have been downloaded with that technology.

Today it would be a conservative estimate to say that most broadband services average around 2 megabytes per second download (2000 kb/sec).  This represents a capacity increase of 35 times, so the potential data downloaded under ideal conditions comes to over 5000 gigabytes!  The 60 gigabyte per month download represents 1.2 % of the ideal capacity of the system under current conditions.  For all practical purposes we can expect information technology to continue to improve in at least a linear fashion and in another ten years for it to increase another 35 times in capacity. In other words, not only does this tariff look stupid now, but as times go by the apparent stupidity of it will increase as well, as that 60 gigabytes per month represents less and less of the total data transfer capacity of the system and Bell Canada is able to charge their customers premium prices for nearly all of the data traffic that passes through it.

A fair tariff (if there is such a thing)  would at least consider charging overage fees based on some ratio between potential and actual use, and as more bandwith becomes available that specific number would increase.  How Bell Canada even came up with this 60 gigabyte per month number itself is completely suspect.  If we were expected to only drive 1 % of the speed our cars were capable of, then we would all be driving somewhere between 1 and 2 kilometers per hour.

To the people who will decide whether or not to implement this decision, please, please, do not give in to this ridiculous proposal from Bell Canada.  Do not slow down the pace of innovation and progress that has been made possible through the internet by allowing them to put up a big toll gate at every intersection.  Say "no" to the culture of entitlement and control that exists at Bell Canada and say "yes" to the future.

*******

Unfortunately, when I tried to submit that whole schpiel I was told that it exeded 2000 characters.  So, I put in my calculations which were the most important part so the rest of my rantings will have to be remembered here.

9Apr/090

Sovereign Immunity Must be Overruled

I agree with president Obama on a lot of things, like reducing the influence of the military industrial complex, or leveraging governmental authority to make health care affordable to the citizens of the United States, or being more open and diplomatic with Islamic countries but to name a few things. On his economic policies I think the things he has tried to do to help the average American taxpayer, like mortgage assistance and higher taxes on the wealthy are good too. He should not have agreed to bail out the banks in my opinion, but I realize that is pretty much a lost cause at this point.

Professor Turley from George Washington University is right in this case, to disagree with president Obama over the issues of sovereign immunity. To give the government a free hand to invade the privacy of its citizens, and to give the Bush administration a "get out of jail free" card for all of the illegal and immoral acts that it perpetrated while in power, is just plain wrong. This is something that every U.S. citizen should know about and should take steps to raise awareness and to create a discussion about where this kind of decision will lead us. We don't want to go there. The government is powerful enough without closing the door on its citizens ability to question its actions.

31Oct/080

If the world could vote.

Apparently, the McCain campaign is doing really well in Macedonia.

Other than that, if the world could vote, looks like Obama is winning by a landslide.

31Aug/080

The End is Near

Is America really ready for a change?  I hope so.  I think that the rest of the world is ready too, at least the part I live in.  This will be the second presidential election that I have witnessed from the Canadian side of the border, and I'm hoping that this time I won't be so disappointed.  Part of me still can't believe that "W." was re-elected but fortunately his chapter in history as "leader of the free world" will soon be over.

Since 2003 I have met only a single person in Toronto that said they would have voted for Bush if given the opportunity.  I know that out west there are more Bush sympathizers, but here the opinion is that he was and is a terrible president, probably the worst president in the history of the United States.  I would have to agree.

There was an article in the New York Times the other day about Bush's decision for the troop surge in Iraq.  This article praised Bush for sending in more troops and credited this decision to the decrease in violence there.  I agree that tactically it was the right thing to do, the results speak for themselves.  What the article failed to remind us was that Bush invaded Iraq illegally.  He generated false intelligence and presented it to congress.  It is quite simple, really, he is a traitor.  Unfortunately being the president of the United States gives him a lot of legal and political clout and it looks like he will get away with it.  In the past, U. S. citizens have been executed for much lesser crimes.  It would be my greatest joy to see him prosecuted after he leaves office but I think the chances of that are quite slim.

As far as I am concerned the "troop surge" is one of the few things that Bush did right, but it wouldn't have been necessary if Iraq hadn't been invaded in the first place.

I'm still a registered voter in the state of Oklahoma, and I will be voting for Barak Obama this November.  If you are an American reading this please remember all of the blood that has been spilled, relations soured, reputations tarnished, and ask yourself, Was it worth it?  Are we any better off?  Are Americans really safer?  Saddam is dead but Osama is still out there.  The rich are richer and the poor are poorer.  It is time for a change.  Open your eyes.