Macbraughton

I just received this email from my ISP.  After reading it over I posted a response to the indicated URL.  I wanted to show the world just how manipulative and evil Bell Canada can be.  I should know, I worked for one of their mutant symbionts in the states (AT&T formerly known as SBC formerly known as Southwestern Bell before the breakup of Ma Bell when they and Verizon and Bell Canada  were all just parts of the biggest monopoly the world had ever seen).

**********

Dear Valued Customer,

We are writing to you today as many activities are underway to shape/reshape
Internet use as you all know it. Over the last year some of you have been
made aware and/or have seen activities on throttling in the news or in your
daily lives. Another proceeding relating to the Internet in Canada required
Telecom providers (Bell/Telus/etc.) to provide ISPs with wholesale service
speeds that match those that they offer to their own retail customers.
Specifically, Bell has been directed by the CRTC to provide matching speeds
which would allow us all to have more flexibility in our day to day online
requirements. Instead of adhering to these directives, Bell decided to take
this issue to the federal Cabinet and at the same time file a tariff
application with the CRTC proposing to introduce Usage Based Billing (UBB)
on its wholesale customer accounts.

What does this mean for you, the consumer?

Bell provides TekSavvy with last mile, wholesale DSL access services, which
TekSavvy uses to provide you with your Internet access. If Bell were to be
allowed to introduce UBB on this service, a cap of 60GB would be imposed on
all of its users, with very heavy penalties per Gigabyte afterwards
(multiple times more than our current per Gigabyte rate of $0.25/GB on
overages). This would inherently all but remove Unlimited internet services
in Ontario/Quebec and potentially cause large increases in internet costs
from month to month.

If you’d like to make your comments/concerns known about what Bell is
attempting to do, please do so here:

http://support.crtc.gc.ca/crtcsubmissionmu/forms/Telecom.aspx?lang=e

Select the word “Tariff” from the drop down list.

Add the following in Subject Line “File Number # 8740-B2-200904989 – Bell
Canada – TN 7181″ and make your thoughts known!

The deadline for filing your comments is today at midnight, so hurry!

Regards,

*********

HERE IS MY RESPONSE:

Nothing less than the future of Canadian innovation is at stake with this tariff.  The only party this helps is Bell Canada, and their legacy of control and manipulation.  There is no way that this is good for the average consumer who will end up paying for it.  Rather than becoming more competitive and implementing technology that gives consumers more choice and more value for their money, Bell Canada is seeking governmental approval for its mismanagement and abuse of technological resources.

Ten years ago 60 gigabytes a month of downloads would have seemed an outrageously high number.  But then again, ten years ago a dial-up internet connection and 56 kilobytes per second was the norm. Even so, under ideal conditions it would have been possible to download over 145 gigabytes of data in a month! (56 kb/sec * 60 sec * 60 min * 24 hours * 30 days = 145152000 kb = 145.152 GB/month).  So even though 60 gigabytes seemed like a lot back then it still represented less than half of the potential amount of data that could have been downloaded with that technology.

Today it would be a conservative estimate to say that most broadband services average around 2 megabytes per second download (2000 kb/sec).  This represents a capacity increase of 35 times, so the potential data downloaded under ideal conditions comes to over 5000 gigabytes!  The 60 gigabyte per month download represents 1.2 % of the ideal capacity of the system under current conditions.  For all practical purposes we can expect information technology to continue to improve in at least a linear fashion and in another ten years for it to increase another 35 times in capacity. In other words, not only does this tariff look stupid now, but as times go by the apparent stupidity of it will increase as well, as that 60 gigabytes per month represents less and less of the total data transfer capacity of the system and Bell Canada is able to charge their customers premium prices for nearly all of the data traffic that passes through it.

A fair tariff (if there is such a thing)  would at least consider charging overage fees based on some ratio between potential and actual use, and as more bandwith becomes available that specific number would increase.  How Bell Canada even came up with this 60 gigabyte per month number itself is completely suspect.  If we were expected to only drive 1 % of the speed our cars were capable of, then we would all be driving somewhere between 1 and 2 kilometers per hour.

To the people who will decide whether or not to implement this decision, please, please, do not give in to this ridiculous proposal from Bell Canada.  Do not slow down the pace of innovation and progress that has been made possible through the internet by allowing them to put up a big toll gate at every intersection.  Say “no” to the culture of entitlement and control that exists at Bell Canada and say “yes” to the future.

*******

Unfortunately, when I tried to submit that whole schpiel I was told that it exeded 2000 characters.  So, I put in my calculations which were the most important part so the rest of my rantings will have to be remembered here.