What I Thunk
What if I just told you what I thunk
Didn't hide behind the lies and all the junk
That unfiltered flow covered all my pages
And my minds agony burst out in rages
Would you listen?
Would you run?
Would you show me how it's done?
When you watch my soul come undone, unspun, in public, in the sun?
How fruitless is this earth
When sterility is our girth
And senility is our plight
As we look into the long dark night
I'm enraged and disengaged as I age inside my cage
As the sands of time flow faster
I race towards my Master
My Muse
My Light
The Source of my delight
The One who always knows
All those things I don't disclose
To all the yo's and the swine
Who take my pearls and whine
Then plot and design
To silence my divine
Energy | Karma
It's my life, my Dharma
That they be hatin'
So they waitin'
Till I slip up
Then they be wastin'
Me if they can
Or a friend I call "my man"
That's the plan
And as it stands
I don't think I'll ever get out of this place alive
Will you?
So while I'm here
I'm gonna give it
Gonna be sincere
Gonna live it
Stop hidin' my light
'neath that bushel
Not tryin' to push y'all
Just remindin'
That those earthly lights may be blindin'
But they neva can compare
To those lights in the air
Those heavenly hosts
Be aware
They there
Ain't goin' no where
Till the new day comes to wipe it all clean
Know what I mean?
Look, I'm not tryin' to be apocolyptic
But let's just say,
It's hard not to get cryptic
When we lookin' at that crazy shit on the screen
While we hear
Playing in our heads
"Life is but a dream"
Or an illusion
What is it?
I don't know
But I won't dis it
I'll just kiss it
Don't wanna miss it
This may be our only chance
To bliss it
Canadian Market Just Doesn’t Get the Nexus One Google Phone
I'm not claiming to be an expert or anything, but I did spend a good six months following the HTC Hero story before it came to market. In case you missed that one, its release was a watershed moment in the history of the Android OS. Many people have agreed that it was the first device to really compete with the iPhone head to head and showed that Google's foray into the smartphone realm was more than just a half-baked afterthought.
I haven't followed the Nexus One story much at all, actually, until now. But I believe that it makes the Hero seem like just another iPhone rip-off. That's because what we are getting with the Nexus One isn't just another smartphone, it is a whole different way of relating to the telecommunications industry.
Many people are still unaware of VOIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol). This is a telephone service that works just like your traditional landline, except instead of using an analog signal (the kind used by Alexander Graham Bell himself in the first phone call), it uses a digital signal that is transmitted over the internet. The great advantage of this technology is that traditional phone lines can still be used, but using digital technology increases the bandwidth of the transmission. In other words, you don't need an analog signal anymore, all you need is an internet connection (whether that be DSL or cable or satellite) and you can make and receive telephone calls.
This technology has yet to make its way into the cellular market for many reasons. The main one being that its introduction would seriously hurt the bottom line of cellular companies. Just think, with VOIP on a cell phone you don't even need a "Talk & Text Plan". All you need is a data plan. With a data plan you can use Skype, or Google Voice or some other technology out there that we haven't even heard of or hasn't been invented yet.
The Nexus One is pushing the limits by going for the jugular of the cellphone industry. That main vein is the outrageous prices that the industry places on consumers for traditional services that have basically been rendered obsolete by the emergence of new technologies like VOIP (don't even get me started on the text-message thing, which is an even more outrageous story of manipulation and incredibly lucrative for the entrenched powers).
The reason that most people don't know about this in Canada is obvious. Rogers, Bell and Telus have the highest rates of any cellular companies in the world. Anything that would jeopardize their cartel is blasted in the major press because they not only control a lot of the media directly, but also indirectly through advertising. They aren't going to be paying the Globe and Mail or National Post or even the Toronto Star for advertising if their reporters are telling the public how they are being ripped off (much less reporting those stories themselves).
This missing puzzle piece in Canada, to really make the Nexus One a game changer in this market, will be for some Canadian Cellular company to offer "data only" cellular plans. What that would look like is that you buy a sim card from a cellular provider and pay for a data plan only instead of a talk and text with data which is the current norm. This really isn't that different from buying a USB stick that you hook up to your laptop, it is just that we still don't think of smartphones as handheld computers. The reality is that is just exactly what they are. Millions of dollars in advertising revenue are being spent to keep you and everyone else in Canada from realizing this (and to be fair, it is happening in the US as well, but at least T-Mobile is already on board with Google).
I have an inkling of hope that Globalive will be offering this type of service through Wind Mobile, but only time will tell. As for me, I'm hoping that Google offers the Nexus One directly to Canadian consumers sooner than later, I want one! How about you?
Toronto Emergency Services Down to 75% Staffing Levels
I'm just trying to get the word out everyone. If you look at the wording of official City of Toronto corporation when it comes to Emergency Services, here are a few quotes:
The official statement from Mayor David Miller (who, BTW, happens to have a twitter page @mayormiller.)
And although impacted by the work stoppage, emergency medical services will continue to operate...
And city councilor for my area, Mark Grimes, put on his twitter page @Mark_Grimes:
I regret the inconveniences caused by the strike. The City is trying to bring this to a quick resolution. Emergency Services are operating.
Because the city is so focused on the lack of garbage collection, the public is still not being told clearly that when you call 911 for an ambulance, there will be less dispatchers to answer the phones, and there will be less paramedics on the road to take patients to the hospital by ambulance. Emergency response times will be affected, how could they not be with only 75% of us working?
In an emergency, seconds can make the difference between life and death. The politicians are therefore playing with people's lives at this point, asking for unreasonable concessions that will probably end up with the Province of Ontario stepping in and passing legislation, as John Laforet discusses in his blogpost City Negotiators Need to Ask ‘What Would Arbitration Do?’
I received my phone call last night informing me that I am not supposed to come to my scheduled shift for this evening. Please understand, I am not exaggerating, I am an emergency medical dispatcher for the City of Toronto. I was scheduled to go into work tonight. I can personally attest that there will be one less person to answer the phone and dispatch ambulances if you call 911 for an ambulance tonight. I am officially on strike.
Ask yourself, should the City of Toronto be able to put public health at risk for their political maneuvering? This is just plain wrong. The people that are really hurt over this are the sick and elderly, the weak and dying, those who already have no one to stand up for them. Call or email or write the mayor's office and your local city councilor and tell them that you want 100% of the Emergency Medical Services to be operational!
You can find a copy of Mayor Miller's statement as well as links to many of the media resources on the Toronto strike at Torontopedia.ca. Please help raise awareness that 911 ambulance dispatchers and paramedics are on strike as well by passing this post on to others. Thank you for your support and comments.
Fighting myself
You know, with a name like Macbraughton, which apparently I can't even spell myself, it is no wonder that people have trouble finding the stuff I write on my blog. After god-knows-how-long I just noticed that I had spelled it wrong in the wordpress header settings and all of my pages were titled Macbraugton instead of Macbraughton.
So just for the record, and for the bots out there, my name is spelled Macbraughton. Not Mac Braughton, Mac Broughton, Macbroughton, Mcbraughton, Mcbroughton, Mcbroten, Macbroten, Macbrotten, Mcbrotten, or any other damn mispelling that I can't think of at the moment.
There can be only one!
Rogers Profiles my Wife in Attempts to Sell a Phone
So I've been telling my wife for months to wait to buy a new cellphone because although the iPhone is really cool, Google's Android platform is even cooler being open source and running Linux and all. I've got to give it to Rogers... I had read that they were planning to launch their "revolution"in the beginning of June but haven't had the time lately to catch all the details. Just now I found this video with none other than Canadian/American actor Joshua Jackson as the Rogers spokesperson for their launch of the HTC Dream and Magic phones.
It's a little creepy, because next to David Duchovny I don't know if there is any other actor that my wife begins involuntarily salivating over every time his image appears (don't worry, I don't get the David Duchovny thing either). I never thought that there was such a specific nerdy female demographic in Canada but apparently there is and my wife is the target market.
I was going to try to get her to keep waiting because there are rumours on the internet that the new Canadian wireless entrant Globalive (aka Yak) is supposed to be coming out with the HTC phones later this year at much more competetive prices, but I don't know if I can outsell Joshua Jackson. I showed her the promo video and before I knew what was happening she started watching youtube clips of him and downloading season 1 of Fringe off of bittorrent and telling me about his upcoming movies.
Damn you Rogers, I admit I am dead sexy but I haven't been in any major movies yet. If she buys the G1 from you, you should at least give me a cut because I was the one who told her that Android was cool in the first place.
File Number # 8740-B2-200904989 – Bell Canada – TN 7181
I just received this email from my ISP. After reading it over I posted a response to the indicated URL. I wanted to show the world just how manipulative and evil Bell Canada can be. I should know, I worked for one of their mutant symbionts in the states (AT&T formerly known as SBC formerly known as Southwestern Bell before the breakup of Ma Bell when they and Verizon and Bell Canada were all just parts of the biggest monopoly the world had ever seen).
**********
Dear Valued Customer,
We are writing to you today as many activities are underway to shape/reshape
Internet use as you all know it. Over the last year some of you have been
made aware and/or have seen activities on throttling in the news or in your
daily lives. Another proceeding relating to the Internet in Canada required
Telecom providers (Bell/Telus/etc.) to provide ISPs with wholesale service
speeds that match those that they offer to their own retail customers.
Specifically, Bell has been directed by the CRTC to provide matching speeds
which would allow us all to have more flexibility in our day to day online
requirements. Instead of adhering to these directives, Bell decided to take
this issue to the federal Cabinet and at the same time file a tariff
application with the CRTC proposing to introduce Usage Based Billing (UBB)
on its wholesale customer accounts.
What does this mean for you, the consumer?
Bell provides TekSavvy with last mile, wholesale DSL access services, which
TekSavvy uses to provide you with your Internet access. If Bell were to be
allowed to introduce UBB on this service, a cap of 60GB would be imposed on
all of its users, with very heavy penalties per Gigabyte afterwards
(multiple times more than our current per Gigabyte rate of $0.25/GB on
overages). This would inherently all but remove Unlimited internet services
in Ontario/Quebec and potentially cause large increases in internet costs
from month to month.
If you'd like to make your comments/concerns known about what Bell is
attempting to do, please do so here:
http://support.crtc.gc.ca/crtcsubmissionmu/forms/Telecom.aspx?lang=e
Select the word "Tariff" from the drop down list.
Add the following in Subject Line "File Number # 8740-B2-200904989 - Bell
Canada - TN 7181" and make your thoughts known!
The deadline for filing your comments is today at midnight, so hurry!
Regards,
*********
HERE IS MY RESPONSE:
Nothing less than the future of Canadian innovation is at stake with this tariff. The only party this helps is Bell Canada, and their legacy of control and manipulation. There is no way that this is good for the average consumer who will end up paying for it. Rather than becoming more competitive and implementing technology that gives consumers more choice and more value for their money, Bell Canada is seeking governmental approval for its mismanagement and abuse of technological resources.
Ten years ago 60 gigabytes a month of downloads would have seemed an outrageously high number. But then again, ten years ago a dial-up internet connection and 56 kilobytes per second was the norm. Even so, under ideal conditions it would have been possible to download over 145 gigabytes of data in a month! (56 kb/sec * 60 sec * 60 min * 24 hours * 30 days = 145152000 kb = 145.152 GB/month). So even though 60 gigabytes seemed like a lot back then it still represented less than half of the potential amount of data that could have been downloaded with that technology.
Today it would be a conservative estimate to say that most broadband services average around 2 megabytes per second download (2000 kb/sec). This represents a capacity increase of 35 times, so the potential data downloaded under ideal conditions comes to over 5000 gigabytes! The 60 gigabyte per month download represents 1.2 % of the ideal capacity of the system under current conditions. For all practical purposes we can expect information technology to continue to improve in at least a linear fashion and in another ten years for it to increase another 35 times in capacity. In other words, not only does this tariff look stupid now, but as times go by the apparent stupidity of it will increase as well, as that 60 gigabytes per month represents less and less of the total data transfer capacity of the system and Bell Canada is able to charge their customers premium prices for nearly all of the data traffic that passes through it.
A fair tariff (if there is such a thing) would at least consider charging overage fees based on some ratio between potential and actual use, and as more bandwith becomes available that specific number would increase. How Bell Canada even came up with this 60 gigabyte per month number itself is completely suspect. If we were expected to only drive 1 % of the speed our cars were capable of, then we would all be driving somewhere between 1 and 2 kilometers per hour.
To the people who will decide whether or not to implement this decision, please, please, do not give in to this ridiculous proposal from Bell Canada. Do not slow down the pace of innovation and progress that has been made possible through the internet by allowing them to put up a big toll gate at every intersection. Say "no" to the culture of entitlement and control that exists at Bell Canada and say "yes" to the future.
*******
Unfortunately, when I tried to submit that whole schpiel I was told that it exeded 2000 characters. So, I put in my calculations which were the most important part so the rest of my rantings will have to be remembered here.
Sovereign Immunity Must be Overruled
I agree with president Obama on a lot of things, like reducing the influence of the military industrial complex, or leveraging governmental authority to make health care affordable to the citizens of the United States, or being more open and diplomatic with Islamic countries but to name a few things. On his economic policies I think the things he has tried to do to help the average American taxpayer, like mortgage assistance and higher taxes on the wealthy are good too. He should not have agreed to bail out the banks in my opinion, but I realize that is pretty much a lost cause at this point.
Professor Turley from George Washington University is right in this case, to disagree with president Obama over the issues of sovereign immunity. To give the government a free hand to invade the privacy of its citizens, and to give the Bush administration a "get out of jail free" card for all of the illegal and immoral acts that it perpetrated while in power, is just plain wrong. This is something that every U.S. citizen should know about and should take steps to raise awareness and to create a discussion about where this kind of decision will lead us. We don't want to go there. The government is powerful enough without closing the door on its citizens ability to question its actions.
When the Wolf’s at the Door
On Wednesday President Bush warned Americans about the impending economic crisis and said that if Congress refused to act then the country would go into a recession. Let's just take a few moments to ask some questions.
1. How is Congress to blame for the fact that the banks gave a bunch of money to people who couldn't pay it back? This is purely the result of bad decisions by investors and speculators. Many people were hoping to make loads of money on these deals, instead they lost their ass and took the whole country with them. And now they are holding a gun to the head of the American people saying, "You think it's bad now, if you don't give me more money right away it's going to get really ugly."
2. What happened to "free-market" economics? The big banks and fiscal conservatives champion this one all the time, when it is in their best interest to do so. Now that they're loosing money they're crying "Momma!" I don't know why people are suddenly objecting to America becoming a socialist country now, it has been a socialist country for the rich for most of its history.
3. What is this really going to cost? It always costs more than they say it's going to. So $700 billion is just the first estimate. We're talking most likely somewhere in the trillions. The taxpayers have already been shelling out $100 billion a year on Iraq since 2003, does anybody remember what that was supposed to cost?
4. How do you stop a recession (or for that matter, depression)? This is the kicker, because nobody knows the answer to this question. All of the economic data going back to the beginning of the Industrial Revolution shows cycles of boom and bust. For all of its bluster, economics is still a relatively new field of study. Maybe after a few more hundreds of years we'll be able to say for certain, but who knows? The guys at the Treasury Department are espousing a theory of what to do, they have no idea whether if it will actually do any good whatsoever.
5. What is the actual value of these bad investments? I would argue that the money people are afraid of loosing never existed in the first place. These "bad investments" we keep hearing about were mortgages clumped together and sold and re-sold and traded and used as credit between the big banks in dozens different ways. There still isn't anybody who can come to the table right now and explain what these financial instruments are actually worth. Their value still lies off in the future where only time will tell whether or not people will pay their mortgages or go into foreclosure (which is related to the overall future of the economy).
6. Where is the U.S. economy headed these days anyway? Is it destined to be the richest country in the world for all of eternity or is the global economy changing things? There is the possibility that there are much broader causes for the general problems in the U.S. economy, and that the housing crisis is just the most visible part. All of the margins that have put the United States in the lead over the years are beginning to fall off. There really is no guarantee that dumping all of this money into the banks will fix things. It may actually just give the people who have squandered our wealth over the years the last penny in our pockets.
7. Is unlimited economic growth a feasible goal? The current pace of "economic development" has still left billions of people poor and irreversibly destroyed much of the earth's natural economy, the environment. What many people still seem to miss is that infinite growth of anything in a finite space will destroy everthing in its environment in the process of following it's growth curve (i.e. "There ain't room enough in this town for the both of us!").
8. What about all of the other countries? If this is really going to effect the global economy, how come no other countries are stepping in to pledge their support? For example, China has loads of cash, why aren't they pumping money into the global economy? I think that the other countries either expect the U.S. to fix everything or they view trying to intervene themselves a waste of money. Either way, it looks like the States are on their own this time.
Okay, so say it is in the best interest of all Americans and "for the economy" if we give the crybabies their $700 billion pacifier. Who better to tell the American people that this needs to be done than George W. Bush, the most devisive and inept president in the history of the country, and during his last "lame-duck" months in office no-less. I mean, come on, this is the same guy who said that there were WMDs in Iraq, and that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were buds. I don't know the exact numbers, but I do know the national debt has exponentially increased during his last seven-and-a-half years in office. I can say for sure is that he has been the most expensive president to ever sit in the oval office. Everyone has forgotten by now, but the last time the economy was looking even close to as unstable was when he first came to office (I refuse to say he was "elected"). Come on, think, remember Enron? Maybe this should become a battle cry like "Remember the Alamo!" Anybody who still listens to a thing this guy says is a total doofus. As others before me have pointed out, he is the ipitome of the boy who cried wolf.
So if there is anywhere where I could put the blame for the economic mess in the U.S., it is on George W. Bush. If he had not destroyed his credibility a hundred different ways over the years then he may well have been able to use his executive powers and influence to change the course of things for the better. One thing is for sure, the wolf is at the door, and he's getting dinner tonight. Some sheep will be sacrificed on the altar to the God of money and in the end the poor will be worse off.
